Debian: DSA-4652-1: gnutls28 security update

    Date 04 Apr 2020
    330
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    A flaw was reported in the DTLS protocol implementation in GnuTLS, a library implementing the TLS and SSL protocols. The DTLS client would not contribute any randomness to the DTLS negotiation, breaking the security guarantees of the DTLS protocol.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4652-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    April 04, 2020                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : gnutls28
    CVE ID         : CVE-2020-11501
    Debian Bug     : 955556
    
    A flaw was reported in the DTLS protocol implementation in GnuTLS, a
    library implementing the TLS and SSL protocols. The DTLS client would
    not contribute any randomness to the DTLS negotiation, breaking the
    security guarantees of the DTLS protocol.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.6.7-4+deb10u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your gnutls28 packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of gnutls28 please refer to its
    security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/gnutls28
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you agree with the use of facial recognition technology?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/27-do-you-agree-with-the-use-of-facial-recognition-technology?task=poll.vote&format=json
    27
    radio
    [{"id":"97","title":"Yes","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"98","title":"In certain cases","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"2","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"99","title":"Never","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.