Debian: DSA-4654-1: chromium security update

    Date 07 Apr 2020
    252
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the chromium web browser. CVE-2020-6450
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4654-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                          Michael Gilbert
    April 07, 2020                        https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : chromium
    CVE ID         : CVE-2020-6450 CVE-2020-6451 CVE-2020-6452
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in the chromium web browser.
    
    CVE-2020-6450
    
        Man Yue Mo discovered a use-after-free issue in the WebAudio
        implementation.
    
    CVE-2020-6451
    
        Man Yue Mo discovered a use-after-free issue in the WebAudio
        implementation.
    
    CVE-2020-6452
    
        asnine discovered a buffer overflow issue.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), security support for chromium
    has been discontinued.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
    version 80.0.3987.162-1~deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your chromium packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of chromium please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/chromium
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you agree with Linus Torvalds' decision to reject the controversial patch mitigating the Snoop attack on Intel CPUs?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/28-do-you-agree-with-linus-torvalds-decision-to-reject-the-controversial-patch-mitigating-the-snoop-attack-on-intel-cpus?task=poll.vote&format=json
    28
    radio
    [{"id":"100","title":"Yes - this was undoubtedly the right decision.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"101","title":"Not sure...","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"2","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"102","title":"No - he made a big mistake here.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.