Debian: DSA-4695-1: firefox-esr security update

    Date 03 Jun 2020
    184
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web browser, which could potentially result in the execution of arbitrary code or a timing attack on cryptographic keys.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-4695-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 03, 2020                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : firefox-esr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2020-12399 CVE-2020-12405 CVE-2020-12406 CVE-2020-12410
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
    browser, which could potentially result in the execution of arbitrary
    code or a timing attack on cryptographic keys.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    in version 68.9.0esr-1~deb9u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (buster), these problems have been fixed in
    version 68.9.0esr-1~deb10u1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
    
    For the detailed security status of firefox-esr please refer to
    its security tracker page at:
    https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/firefox-esr
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":18.42,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.53,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":71.05,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]