Fedora 30: ghostscript FEDORA-2019-93e0145607

    Date20 Aug 2019
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    - Fix for CVE-2019-10216 added
    Fedora Update Notification
    2019-08-21 01:04:08.842173
    Name        : ghostscript
    Product     : Fedora 30
    Version     : 9.26
    Release     : 5.fc30
    URL         : https://ghostscript.com/
    Summary     : Interpreter for PostScript language & PDF
    Description :
    This package provides useful conversion utilities based on Ghostscript software,
    for converting PS, PDF and other document formats between each other.
    Ghostscript is a suite of software providing an interpreter for Adobe Systems'
    PostScript (PS) and Portable Document Format (PDF) page description languages.
    Its primary purpose includes displaying (rasterization & rendering) and printing
    of document pages, as well as conversions between different document formats.
    Update Information:
    - Fix for CVE-2019-10216 added
    * Mon Aug 12 2019 Martin Osvald  - 9.26-5
    - Fix for CVE-2019-10216 added
      [ 1 ] Bug #1737080 - CVE-2019-10216 ghostscript: -dSAFER escape via .buildfont1 (701394)
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-93e0145607' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.