Fedora 30: mingw-djvulibre FEDORA-2019-f923712bab

    Date21 Nov 2019
    CategoryFedora
    83
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update backports fixes for CVE-2019-15142, CVE-2019-15143, CVE-2019-15144, CVE-2019-15145, CVE-2019-18804
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fedora Update Notification
    FEDORA-2019-f923712bab
    2019-11-22 01:22:12.839443
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Name        : mingw-djvulibre
    Product     : Fedora 30
    Version     : 3.5.27
    Release     : 7.fc30
    URL         : http://djvu.sourceforge.net/
    Summary     : MinGW Windows djvulibre library
    Description :
    MinGW Windows djvulibre library.
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Update Information:
    
    This update backports fixes for CVE-2019-15142, CVE-2019-15143, CVE-2019-15144,
    CVE-2019-15145, CVE-2019-18804
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ChangeLog:
    
    * Wed Nov 13 2019 Sandro Mani  - 3.5.27-7
    - Backport fix for CVE-2019-15142
    - Backport fix for CVE-2019-15143
    - Backport fix for CVE-2019-15144
    - Backport fix for CVE-2019-15145
    - Backport fix for CVE-2019-18804
    * Tue Oct  8 2019 Sandro Mani  - 3.5.27-6
    - Rebuild (Changes/Mingw32GccDwarf2)
    * Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 3.5.27-5
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    References:
    
      [ 1 ] Bug #1767922 - CVE-2019-15145 mingw-djvulibre: djvulibre: out-of-bounds read in JB2Dict::JB2Codec::get_direct_context in libdjvu/JB2Image.h [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767922
      [ 2 ] Bug #1771268 - CVE-2019-18804 mingw-djvulibre: djvulibre: null pointer dereference in function DJVU::filter_fv in [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771268
      [ 3 ] Bug #1767843 - CVE-2019-15142 mingw-djvulibre: djvulibre: heap-based buffer overflow in GStringRep::strdup in libdjvu/GString.cpp [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767843
      [ 4 ] Bug #1767858 - CVE-2019-15143 mingw-djvulibre: djvulibre: infinite loop in GBitmap::read_rle_raw related to libdjvu/DjVmDir.cpp and libdjvu/GBitmap.cpp [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767858
      [ 5 ] Bug #1767869 - CVE-2019-15144 mingw-djvulibre: djvulibre: recursive call to GArrayTemplate::sort in GContainer.h leads to stack overflow [fedora-all]
            https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767869
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-f923712bab' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html#upgrade-command-label
    
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    https://fedoraproject.org/keys
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.