Fedora 30: rabbitmq-server FEDORA-2019-74d2feb5be

    Date06 Dec 2019
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    * RabbitMQ ver. 3.7.22 * CVE-2019-11281 * CVE-2019-11287
    Fedora Update Notification
    2019-12-07 01:29:55.747397
    Name        : rabbitmq-server
    Product     : Fedora 30
    Version     : 3.7.22
    Release     : 1.fc30
    URL         : https://www.rabbitmq.com/
    Summary     : The RabbitMQ server
    Description :
    RabbitMQ is an implementation of AMQP, the emerging standard for high
    performance enterprise messaging. The RabbitMQ server is a robust and
    scalable implementation of an AMQP broker.
    Update Information:
    * RabbitMQ ver. 3.7.22 * CVE-2019-11281 * CVE-2019-11287
    * Thu Nov 28 2019 Peter Lemenkov  - 3.7.22-1
    - Ver. 3.7.22
    * Wed Jul 24 2019 Peter Lemenkov  - 3.7.16-1
    - Ver. 3.7.16
    * Wed May 22 2019 Peter Lemenkov  - 3.7.15-1
    - Ver. 3.7.15
    * Wed Apr 17 2019 Peter Lemenkov  - 3.7.14-2
    - Mark it as arch-dependent because it uses Elixir.
      [ 1 ] Bug #1767276 - CVE-2019-11281 rabbitmq-server: improper sanitization of vhost limits and federation management UI pages [fedora-all]
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-74d2feb5be' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"82","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.16,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.07,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"42","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.