Fedora 30: xpdf FEDORA-2019-b890d4aad2

    Date09 Dec 2019
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Apply upstream fix for CVE-2019-17064.
    Fedora Update Notification
    2019-12-10 03:03:41.437314
    Name        : xpdf
    Product     : Fedora 30
    Version     : 4.02
    Release     : 2.fc30
    URL         : http://www.xpdfreader.com/
    Summary     : A PDF file viewer for the X Window System
    Description :
    Xpdf is an X Window System based viewer for Portable Document Format
    (PDF) files. Xpdf is a small and efficient program which uses
    standard X fonts.
    Update Information:
    Apply upstream fix for CVE-2019-17064.
    * Mon Dec  2 2019 Tom Callaway  - 1:4.02-2
    - apply upstream fix for CVE-2019-17064
    * Wed Oct 16 2019 Tom Callaway  - 1:4.02-1
    - update to 4.02
    * Sat Jul 27 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1:4.01-2
    - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
      [ 1 ] Bug #1778729 - CVE-2019-17064 xpdf: a NULL pointer dereference because Catalog.pageLabels is initialized too late in the Catalog constructor [fedora-all]
    This update can be installed with the "dnf" update program. Use
    su -c 'dnf upgrade --advisory FEDORA-2019-b890d4aad2' at the command
    line. For more information, refer to the dnf documentation available at
    All packages are signed with the Fedora Project GPG key. More details on the
    GPG keys used by the Fedora Project can be found at
    package-announce mailing list -- This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    To unsubscribe send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"82","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.16,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.07,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"42","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.