Mageia 2019-0214: gvfs security update

    Date21 Jul 2019
    CategoryMageia
    852
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated gvfs package fixes security vulnerabilities: * daemon/gvfsbackendadmin.c mishandles file ownership because setfsuid is not used (CVE-2019-12447). * daemon/gvfsbackendadmin.c has race conditions because the admin backend
    MGASA-2019-0214 - Updated gvfs packages fix security vulnerabilities
    
    Publication date: 21 Jul 2019
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2019-0214.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 6, 7
    CVE: CVE-2019-12447,
         CVE-2019-12448,
         CVE-2019-12449,
         CVE-2019-12795
    
    Updated gvfs package fixes security vulnerabilities:
    
    * daemon/gvfsbackendadmin.c mishandles file ownership because setfsuid
      is not used (CVE-2019-12447).
    * daemon/gvfsbackendadmin.c has race conditions because the admin backend
      doesn't implement query_info_on_read/write (CVE-2019-12448).
    * daemon/gvfsbackendadmin.c mishandles a file's user and group ownership
      during move (and copy with G_FILE_COPY_ALL_METADATA) operations from
      admin:// to file:// URIs, because root privileges are unavailable
      (CVE-2019-12449).
    * daemon/gvfsdaemon.c in gvfsd from GNOME gvfs before 1.38.3, 1.40.x
      before 1.40.2, and 1.41.x before 1.41.3 opened a private D-Bus server
      socket without configuring an authorization rule (CVE-2019-12795)
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25114
    - https://usn.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-4053-1
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-12447
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-12448
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-12449
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-12795
    
    SRPMS:
    - 7/core/gvfs-1.40.1-4.1.mga7
    - 6/core/gvfs-1.32.1-1.2.mga6
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":12.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.