Mageia 2019-0349: glibc security update

    Date30 Nov 2019
    413
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated glibc packages fixes the following security issue: On the x86-64 architecture, the GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.31 fails to ignore the LD_PREFER_MAP_32BIT_EXEC environment variable during program execution after a security transition, allowing local
    MGASA-2019-0349 - Updated glibc packages fix security vulnerability
    
    Publication date: 30 Nov 2019
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2019-0349.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 7
    CVE: CVE-2019-19126
    
    Updated glibc packages fixes the following security issue:
    
    On the x86-64 architecture, the GNU C Library (aka glibc) before 2.31
    fails to ignore the LD_PREFER_MAP_32BIT_EXEC environment variable
    during program execution after a security transition, allowing local
    attackers to restrict the possible mapping addresses for loaded
    libraries and thus bypass ASLR for a setuid program (CVE-2019-19126).
    
    Other upstream fixes in this update:
    - Call _dl_open_check after relocation [BZ #24259]
    - support: Export bindir path on support_path
    - nss_db: fix endent wrt NULL mappings [BZ #24695] [BZ #24696]
    - elf: Refuse to dlopen PIE objects [BZ #24323]
    - Fix alignment of TLS variables for tls variant TLS_TCB_AT_TP [BZ #23403]
    - Fix assertion in malloc.c:tcache_get
    - Small tcache improvements
    - malloc: Remove unwanted leading whitespace in malloc_info [BZ #24867]
    - malloc: Fix missing accounting of top chunk in malloc_info [BZ #24026]
    - Add glibc.malloc.mxfast tunable
    - malloc: Various cleanups for malloc/tst-mxfast
    - Base max_fast on alignment, not width, of bins [BZ #24903]
    - Linux: Use in-tree copy of SO_ constants for !__USE_MISC [BZ #24532]
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-19126
    
    SRPMS:
    - 7/core/glibc-2.29-19.mga7
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the LinuxSecurity Privacy news articles?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/25-what-do-you-think-of-the-linuxsecurity-privacy-news-articles?task=poll.vote&format=json
    25
    radio
    [{"id":"90","title":"Love them!","votes":"93","type":"x","order":"1","pct":79.49,"resources":[]},{"id":"91","title":"I'm indifferent","votes":"18","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"92","title":"Not interested in this topic","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"3","pct":5.13,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.