Mageia 2020-0309: java-1.8.0-openjdk security update

    Date 31 Jul 2020
    204
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Bypass of boundary checks in nio.Buffer via concurrent access. (CVE-2020-14583) Incomplete bounds checks in Affine Transformations. (CVE-2020-14593)
    MGASA-2020-0309 - Updated java-1.8.0-openjdk packages fix security vulnerability
    
    Publication date: 31 Jul 2020
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2020-0309.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 7
    CVE: CVE-2020-14583,
         CVE-2020-14593,
         CVE-2020-14556,
         CVE-2020-14578,
         CVE-2020-14579,
         CVE-2020-14621,
         CVE-2020-14577
    
    Bypass of boundary checks in nio.Buffer via concurrent access.
    (CVE-2020-14583)
    
    Incomplete bounds checks in Affine Transformations. (CVE-2020-14593)
    
    Incorrect handling of access control context in ForkJoinPool.
    (CVE-2020-14556)
    
    Unexpected exception raised by DerInputStream. (CVE-2020-14578)
    
    Unexpected exception raised by DerValue.equals(). (CVE-2020-14579)
    
    XML validation manipulation due to incomplete application of the
    use-grammar-pool-only feature. (CVE-2020-14621)
    
    HostnameChecker does not ensure X.509 certificate names are in
    normalized form. (CVE-2020-14577)
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26960
    - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2972
    - https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14583
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14593
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14556
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14578
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14579
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14621
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-14577
    
    SRPMS:
    - 7/core/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.262-1.b10.1.mga7
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    If you are using full-disk encryption: are you concerned about the resulting performance hit?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/34-if-you-are-using-full-disk-encryption-are-you-concerned-about-the-resulting-performance-hit?task=poll.vote&format=json
    34
    radio
    [{"id":"120","title":"Yes","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":60.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"121","title":"No ","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"2","pct":39.13,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.