openSUSE: 2019:1854-1: moderate: GraphicsMagick

    Date14 Aug 2019
    CategoryopenSUSE
    257
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that contains security fixes can now be installed.
       openSUSE Security Update: Security update for GraphicsMagick
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    openSUSE-SU-2019:1854-1
    Rating:             moderate
    References:         #1138425 
    Affected Products:
                        openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that contains security fixes can now be installed.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for GraphicsMagick fixes the following issues:
    
       - disable indirect reads that disclosed file contents from the local
         system (boo#1138425)
    
       This update was imported from the openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Update update project.
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this openSUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1:
    
          zypper in -t patch openSUSE-2019-1854=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1 (x86_64):
    
          GraphicsMagick-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          GraphicsMagick-devel-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          libGraphicsMagick++-Q16-12-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          libGraphicsMagick++-devel-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          libGraphicsMagick-Q16-3-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          libGraphicsMagick3-config-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          libGraphicsMagickWand-Q16-2-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
          perl-GraphicsMagick-1.3.29-bp151.5.3.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1138425
    
    -- 
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.