openSUSE: 2020:0685-1: moderate: python-rpyc

    Date 22 May 2020
    88
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
       openSUSE Security Update: Security update for python-rpyc
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    openSUSE-SU-2020:0685-1
    Rating:             moderate
    References:         #1152987 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-16328
    Affected Products:
                        openSUSE Leap 15.1
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for python-rpyc to 4.1.5 fixes the following issues:
    
       Security issue fixed:
    
       - CVE-2019-16328: Fixed a missing protocol security check that could have
         led to code execution (boo#1152987).
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this openSUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - openSUSE Leap 15.1:
    
          zypper in -t patch openSUSE-2020-685=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - openSUSE Leap 15.1 (noarch):
    
          python2-rpyc-4.1.5-lp151.3.3.1
          python3-rpyc-4.1.5-lp151.3.3.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-16328.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1152987
    
    -- 
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you agree with Linus Torvalds' decision to reject the controversial patch mitigating the Snoop attack on Intel CPUs?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/28-do-you-agree-with-linus-torvalds-decision-to-reject-the-controversial-patch-mitigating-the-snoop-attack-on-intel-cpus?task=poll.vote&format=json
    28
    radio
    [{"id":"100","title":"Yes - this was undoubtedly the right decision.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"101","title":"Not sure...","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":100,"resources":[]},{"id":"102","title":"No - he made a big mistake here.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.