openSUSE: 2020:0698-1: moderate: pdns-recursor

    Date 23 May 2020
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes three vulnerabilities is now available.
       openSUSE Security Update: Security update for pdns-recursor
    Announcement ID:    openSUSE-SU-2020:0698-1
    Rating:             moderate
    References:         #1171553 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2020-10030 CVE-2020-10995 CVE-2020-12244
    Affected Products:
                        openSUSE Leap 15.1
                        openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1
       An update that fixes three vulnerabilities is now available.
       This update for pdns-recursor fixes the following issues:
       - update to 4.1.16
         * fixes an issue where records in the answer section of a NXDOMAIN
           response lacking an SOA were not properly validated (CVE-2020-12244,
         * fixes an issue where invalid hostname on the server can result in
           disclosure of invalid memory (CVE-2020-10030, boo#1171553)
         * fixes an issue in the DNS protocol has been found that allows
           malicious parties to use recursive DNS services to attack third party
           authoritative name servers (CVE-2020-10995, boo#1171553)
       For details see
    Patch Instructions:
       To install this openSUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
       - openSUSE Leap 15.1:
          zypper in -t patch openSUSE-2020-698=1
       - openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1:
          zypper in -t patch openSUSE-2020-698=1
    Package List:
       - openSUSE Leap 15.1 (x86_64):
       - openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP1 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64):

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you agree with Linus Torvalds' decision to reject the controversial patch mitigating the Snoop attack on Intel CPUs?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"100","title":"Yes - this was undoubtedly the right decision.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":"101","title":"Not sure...","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":"102","title":"No - he made a big mistake here.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200


    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.