SciLinux: SLSA-2019-2471-1 Moderate: openssl on SL6.x i386/x86_64

    Date13 Aug 2019
    358
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Scientific Large
    openssl: 0-byte record padding oracle (CVE-2019-1559) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section. SL6 x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm openssl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.x86_64.rpm openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm openssl- [More...]
    Synopsis:          Moderate: openssl security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2019:2471-1
    Issue Date:        2019-08-13
    CVE Numbers:       CVE-2019-1559
    --
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * openssl: 0-byte record padding oracle (CVE-2019-1559)
    
    For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS
    score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE
    page(s) listed in the References section.
    --
    
    SL6
      x86_64
        openssl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        openssl-devel-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-devel-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        openssl-perl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        openssl-static-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
      i386
        openssl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-debuginfo-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-devel-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-perl-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
        openssl-static-1.0.1e-58.el6_10.i686.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"40","type":"x","order":"1","pct":48.78,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"29","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.37,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.