SciLinux: SLSA-2019-2729-1 Critical: firefox on SL7.x x86_64

    Date12 Sep 2019
    396
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Mozilla: Sandbox escape through Firefox Sync (CVE-2019-9812) * Mozilla: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 69, Firefox ESR 68.1, and Firefox ESR 60.9 (CVE-2019-11740) * Mozilla: Same-origin policy violation with SVG filters and canvas to steal cross-origin images (CVE-2019-11742) * Mozilla: XSS by breaking out of title and textarea elements using innerHTML (CVE-2019-11744) * Mozilla: Use- [More...]
    Synopsis:          Critical: firefox security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2019:2729-1
    Issue Date:        2019-09-11
    CVE Numbers:       CVE-2019-9812 CVE-2019-11733 CVE-2019-11740 
                           CVE-2019-11742 CVE-2019-11743 CVE-2019-11744 
                           CVE-2019-11746 CVE-2019-11752 
    --
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * Mozilla: Sandbox escape through Firefox Sync (CVE-2019-9812)
    
    * Mozilla: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 69, Firefox ESR 68.1, and
    Firefox ESR 60.9 (CVE-2019-11740)
    
    * Mozilla: Same-origin policy violation with SVG filters and canvas to
    steal cross-origin images (CVE-2019-11742)
    
    * Mozilla: XSS by breaking out of title and textarea elements using
    innerHTML (CVE-2019-11744)
    
    * Mozilla: Use-after-free while manipulating video (CVE-2019-11746)
    
    * Mozilla: Use-after-free while extracting a key value in IndexedDB
    (CVE-2019-11752)
    
    * firefox: stored passwords in 'Saved Logins' can be copied without master
    password entry (CVE-2019-11733)
    
    * Mozilla: Cross-origin access to unload event attributes (CVE-2019-11743)
    --
    
    SL7
      x86_64
        firefox-60.9.0-1.el7_7.x86_64.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-60.9.0-1.el7_7.x86_64.rpm
        firefox-60.9.0-1.el7_7.i686.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-60.9.0-1.el7_7.i686.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.