SciLinux: SLSA-2019-4108-1 Critical: firefox on SL6.x i386/x86_64

    Date06 Dec 2019
    57
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Mozilla: Use-after-free in worker destruction (CVE-2019-17008) * Mozilla: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 71 and Firefox ESR 68.3 (CVE-2019-17012) * Mozilla: Buffer overflow in plain text serializer (CVE-2019-17005) * Mozilla: Use-after-free when performing device orientation checks (CVE-2019-17010) * Mozilla: Use-after-free when retrieving a document in antitracking (CVE-2019-1 [More...]
    Synopsis:          Critical: firefox security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2019:4108-1
    Issue Date:        2019-12-05
    CVE Numbers:       CVE-2019-17008
                       CVE-2019-17010
                       CVE-2019-17005
                       CVE-2019-17011
                       CVE-2019-17012
    --
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * Mozilla: Use-after-free in worker destruction (CVE-2019-17008)
    
    * Mozilla: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 71 and Firefox ESR 68.3
     (CVE-2019-17012)
        
    * Mozilla: Buffer overflow in plain text serializer (CVE-2019-17005)
    
    * Mozilla: Use-after-free when performing device orientation checks
     (CVE-2019-17010)
    
    * Mozilla: Use-after-free when retrieving a document in antitracking
     (CVE-2019-17011)
    --
    
    SL6
      x86_64
        firefox-68.3.0-1.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-68.3.0-1.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        firefox-68.3.0-1.el6_10.i686.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-68.3.0-1.el6_10.i686.rpm
      i386
        firefox-68.3.0-1.el6_10.i686.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-68.3.0-1.el6_10.i686.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the LinuxSecurity Privacy news articles?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/25-what-do-you-think-of-the-linuxsecurity-privacy-news-articles?task=poll.vote&format=json
    25
    radio
    [{"id":"90","title":"Love them!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":100,"resources":[]},{"id":"91","title":"I'm indifferent","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"2","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"92","title":"Not interested in this topic","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.