SciLinux: SLSA-2019-4254-1 Moderate: freetype on SL6.x i386/x86_64

    Date18 Dec 2019
    122
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    freetype: a heap-based buffer over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict in type1/t1parse.c leading to information disclosure (CVE-2015-9381) * freetype: mishandling ps_parser_skip_PS_token in an FT_New_Memory_Face operation in skip_comment, psaux/psobjs.c, leads to a buffer over-read (CVE-2015-9382) SL6 x86_64 freetype-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm freetype-2.3.11-19.el6_10.x86_64.rpm freet [More...]
    Synopsis: Moderate: freetype security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2019:4254-1
    Issue Date:        2019-12-17
    CVE Numbers:       CVE-2015-9381
                       CVE-2015-9382
    --
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * freetype: a heap-based buffer over-read in T1_Get_Private_Dict in
    type1/t1parse.c leading to information disclosure (CVE-2015-9381)
    
    * freetype: mishandling ps_parser_skip_PS_token in an FT_New_Memory_Face
    operation in skip_comment, psaux/psobjs.c, leads to a buffer over-read
    (CVE-2015-9382)
    --
    
    SL6
      x86_64
        freetype-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
        freetype-2.3.11-19.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        freetype-debuginfo-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
        freetype-debuginfo-2.3.11-19.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        freetype-demos-2.3.11-19.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
        freetype-devel-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
        freetype-devel-2.3.11-19.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
      i386
        freetype-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
        freetype-debuginfo-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
        freetype-demos-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
        freetype-devel-2.3.11-19.el6_10.i686.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"81","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.25,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"21","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.58,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"42","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.17,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.