SciLinux: SLSA-2020-0085-1 Critical: firefox on SL7.x x86_64

    Date13 Jan 2020
    63
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update upgrades Firefox to version 68.4.1 ESR. * Mozilla: IonMonkey type confusion with StoreElementHole and FallibleStoreElement (CVE-2019-17026) * Mozilla: Bypass of @namespace CSS sanitization during pasting (CVE-2019-17016) * Mozilla: Type Confusion in XPCVariant.cpp (CVE-2019-17017) * Mozilla: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 72 and Firefox ESR 68.4 (CVE-2019-17024) * Mozilla: [More...]
    Synopsis: Critical: firefox security update
    Advisory ID:       SLSA-2020:0085-1
    Issue Date:        2020-01-13
    CVE Numbers:       CVE-2019-17016
                       CVE-2019-17017
                       CVE-2019-17022
                       CVE-2019-17024
                       CVE-2019-17026
    --
    
    This update upgrades Firefox to version 68.4.1 ESR.
    
    Security Fix(es):
    
    * Mozilla: IonMonkey type confusion with StoreElementHole and
    FallibleStoreElement (CVE-2019-17026)
    
    * Mozilla: Bypass of @namespace CSS sanitization during pasting
    (CVE-2019-17016)
    
    * Mozilla: Type Confusion in XPCVariant.cpp (CVE-2019-17017)
    
    * Mozilla: Memory safety bugs fixed in Firefox 72 and Firefox ESR 68.4
    (CVE-2019-17024)
    
    * Mozilla: CSS sanitization does not escape HTML tags (CVE-2019-17022)
    --
    
    SL7
      x86_64
        firefox-68.4.1-1.el7_7.x86_64.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-68.4.1-1.el7_7.x86_64.rpm
        firefox-68.4.1-1.el7_7.i686.rpm
        firefox-debuginfo-68.4.1-1.el7_7.i686.rpm
    
    - Scientific Linux Development Team
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"81","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.25,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"21","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.58,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"42","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.17,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.