SUSE: 2020:14384-1 transfig

    Date 04 Jun 2020
    102
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
    
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for transfig
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2020:14384-1
    Rating:             low
    References:         #1106531 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2018-16140
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP4
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for transfig fixes the following issues:
    
       Security issue fixed:
    
       - CVE-2018-16140: Fixed a buffer underwrite vulnerability in get_line() in
         read.c, which allowed an attacker to write prior to the beginning of the
         buffer via specially crafted .fig file (bsc#1106531)
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP4:
    
          zypper in -t patch dbgsp4-transfig-14384=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 11-SP4 (i586 ppc64 s390x x86_64):
    
          transfig-debuginfo-3.2.5-160.6.20
          transfig-debugsource-3.2.5-160.6.20
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-16140.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1106531
    
    _______________________________________________
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-security-updates
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":18.42,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.53,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":71.05,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.