Ubuntu 4134-1: IBus vulnerability

    Date16 Sep 2019
    CategoryUbuntu
    433
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    IBus would allow local users to capture key strokes of other locally logged in users.
    ==========================================================================
    Ubuntu Security Notice USN-4134-1
    September 16, 2019
    
    ibus vulnerability
    ==========================================================================
    
    A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:
    
    - Ubuntu 19.04
    - Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
    - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    
    Summary:
    
    IBus would allow local users to capture key strokes of other locally logged
    in users.
    
    Software Description:
    - ibus: Intelligent Input Bus - core
    
    Details:
    
    Simon McVittie discovered that IBus did not enforce appropriate access
    controls on its private D-Bus socket. A local unprivileged user who
    discovers the IBus socket address of another user could exploit this to
    capture the key strokes of the other user.
    
    Update instructions:
    
    The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following
    package versions:
    
    Ubuntu 19.04:
      ibus                            1.5.19-1ubuntu2.1
    
    Ubuntu 18.04 LTS:
      ibus                            1.5.17-3ubuntu5.1
    
    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
      ibus                            1.5.11-1ubuntu2.2
    
    After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make
    all the necessary changes.
    
    References:
      https://usn.ubuntu.com/4134-1
      CVE-2019-14822
    
    Package Information:
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/1.5.19-1ubuntu2.1
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/1.5.17-3ubuntu5.1
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/1.5.11-1ubuntu2.2
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.