Ubuntu 4206-1: GraphicsMagick vulnerabilities

    Date03 Dec 2019
    CategoryUbuntu
    54
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several security issues were fixed in GraphicsMagick.
    ==========================================================================
    Ubuntu Security Notice USN-4206-1
    December 02, 2019
    
    graphicsmagick vulnerabilities
    ==========================================================================
    
    A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:
    
    - Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
    
    Summary:
    
    Several security issues were fixed in GraphicsMagick.
    
    Software Description:
    - graphicsmagick: collection of image processing tools
    
    Details:
    
    It was discovered that GraphicsMagick incorrectly handled certain image files.
    An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service.
    (CVE-2017-10794, CVE-2017-10799, CVE-2017-11102, CVE-2017-11140,
    CVE-2017-11403, CVE-2017-11636, CVE-2017-11637, CVE-2017-13147, CVE-2017-14042,
    CVE-2017-6335)
    
    Update instructions:
    
    The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following
    package versions:
    
    Ubuntu 16.04 LTS:
      graphicsmagick                  1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
      libgraphicsmagick++-q16-12      1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
      libgraphicsmagick-q16-3         1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
    
    In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
    
    References:
      https://usn.ubuntu.com/4206-1
      CVE-2017-10794, CVE-2017-10799, CVE-2017-11102, CVE-2017-11140,
      CVE-2017-11403, CVE-2017-11636, CVE-2017-11637, CVE-2017-13147,
      CVE-2017-14042, CVE-2017-6335
    
    Package Information:
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphicsmagick/1.3.23-1ubuntu0.2
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.