Secure Interaction Design

    Date05 Dec 2002
    3206
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Usability and security aren't contrary goals; don't assume that you must sacrifice one for the sake of the other. In fact, a system that's hard to understand and use will almost certainly have security problems in practice. And a more secure . . . Usability and security aren't contrary goals; don't assume that you must sacrifice one for the sake of the other. In fact, a system that's hard to understand and use will almost certainly have security problems in practice. And a more secure system is a more reliable, more effective system: hence, a more usable system. Here's a definition from Garfinkel and Spafford's book, Practical UNIX and Internet Security:
    "A computer is secure if you can depend on it and its software to behave as you expect."

    Doesn't that look like it would be good for usability, too?

    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you read our distribution advisories on a regular basis?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /component/communitypolls/?task=poll.vote&format=json
    23
    radio
    [{"id":"84","title":"Yes, for a single distribution","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"1","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"85","title":"Yes, for multiple distributions","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"2","pct":60,"resources":[]},{"id":"86","title":"No","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"3","pct":40,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.