Submit a story to LinuxSecurity!

Thanks very much for your interest in sharing your story with us. Our site is driven by users like you.

Post anonymously

Please also feel free to using our GPG key (found on our About page) or email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

    Back

    LWN reviews two firewalling books

    Date28 Feb 2000
    CategoryFirewalls
    6219
    Posted ByAnthony Pell
    Linux Weekly News
    Linux Weekly News gives mostly a thumbs down to Linux Firewalls as well as Building Linux and OpenBSD Firewalls. Read their review to learn of some good points, as well as the bad. "Here we review two Linux firewalling . . . Linux Weekly News gives mostly a thumbs down to Linux Firewalls as well as Building Linux and OpenBSD Firewalls. Read their review to learn of some good points, as well as the bad. "Here we review two Linux firewalling offerings, neither of which is as good as it really could be, but one of which is not bad."

    Related News

    Raluca Ada Popa: Her computer security method could make firewalls a thing of the past
    Raluca Ada Popa: Her computer security method could make firewalls a thing of the past
    Experts Weigh In On New Cryptocurrency Mining Botnet
    Experts Weigh In On New Cryptocurrency Mining Botnet
    Cloud Security Research Reveals Challenges, Areas of Growth in Upcoming Years
    Cloud Security Research Reveals Challenges, Areas of Growth in Upcoming Years
    Five reasons “hacking back” is a recipe for cybersecurity chaos
    Five reasons “hacking back” is a recipe for cybersecurity chaos
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Have you used our RSS feeds?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 4 answer(s).
    /component/communitypolls/?task=poll.vote&format=json
    21
    radio
    [{"id":"77","title":"Yes, for articles","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"78","title":"Yes, for advisories","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"79","title":"Hybrid that contains both","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"80","title":"No","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"4","pct":33.33,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    SciLinux: SLSA-2019-1604-1 Critical: firefox on SL6.x i386/x86_64
    Date26 Jun 2019 @ 06:50
    Ubuntu 4038-2: bzip2 vulnerabilities
    Date26 Jun 2019 @ 06:21
    Ubuntu 4038-1: bzip2 vulnerabilities
    Date26 Jun 2019 @ 05:45
    RedHat: RHSA-2019-1603:01 Critical: firefox security update
    Date25 Jun 2019 @ 13:37

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy. 

    Learn More