Debian: DSA-2060-1: New cacti packages fix SQL injection

    Date 13 Jun 2010
    84
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Stefan Esser discovered that cacti, a front-end to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services, is not properly validating input passed to the rra_id parameter of the graph.php script. Due to checking the input of $_REQUEST but using $_GET input in a query an unauthenticated attacker is able to
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2060-1                     This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                                  Nico Golde
    June 13th, 2010                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cacti
    Vulnerability  : insufficient input sanitization
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    Debian bug     : 582691
    CVE ID         : CVE-2010-2092
    
    Stefan Esser discovered that cacti, a front-end to rrdtool for monitoring
    systems and services, is not properly validating input passed to the rra_id
    parameter of the graph.php script.  Due to checking the input of $_REQUEST
    but using $_GET input in a query an unauthenticated attacker is able to
    perform SQL injections via a crafted rra_id $_GET value and an additional
    valid rra_id $_POST or $_COOKIE value.
    
    
    For the stable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.8.7b-2.1+lenny3.
    
    For the testing distribution (squeeze), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.8.7e-4.
    
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cacti packages.
    
    Upgrade instructions
    - --------------------
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for
    sources.list as given below:
    
    apt-get update
            will update the internal database
    apt-get upgrade
            will install corrected packages
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 alias lenny
    - --------------------------------
    
    Debian (stable)
    - ---------------
    
    Stable updates are available for alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390 and sparc.
    
    Source archives:
    
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.7b-2.1+lenny3.dsc
        Size/MD5 checksum:     1117 bd9650c8f8a8cd1ab9bcf9385516948f
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.7b-2.1+lenny3.diff.gz
        Size/MD5 checksum:    37818 5a336fe8cf710c833521544c121827d2
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.7b.orig.tar.gz
        Size/MD5 checksum:  1972444 aa8a740a6ab88e3634b546c3e1bc502f
    
    Architecture independent packages:
    
      https://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/c/cacti/cacti_0.8.7b-2.1+lenny3_all.deb
        Size/MD5 checksum:  1855976 a7f99b878d484cb6efaab85357b53b66
    
    
      These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on
      its next update.
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb https://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Package info: `apt-cache show ' and https://packages.debian.org/
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.