Featured Linux Articles
Need an in-depth introduction to a new security topic? Our features articles will bring up up-to-date on everything from buffer overflows to SE Linux policy development.
Need an in-depth introduction to a new security topic? Our features articles will bring up up-to-date on everything from buffer overflows to SE Linux policy development.



Open-source security sits right in the middle of how we build software now. Most teams grab code from public repos, plug it in, and move fast. That’s fine until something deep in the stack breaks or turns out to be risky. Transparency helps, but that value depends on the people behind it.



The tee.fail attack targets how Linux handles trusted execution environments. Think of it as a way to peek inside hardware-backed enclaves that should be locked tight. The attack plays with timing and cache behavior to pull data from those protected spaces, and researchers proved it works without needing full kernel access. That’s what makes it unsettling — it sidesteps the layers we usually rely on to keep sensitive code and keys safe.



I’ve been around Linux long enough to stop expecting much from intro books. Most of them walk through commands — maybe a few flags — and never explain why those commands behave the way they do. You end up memorizing steps instead of understanding the system underneath.



PAM sits at the center of Linux authentication. Every login, SSH session, and privilege escalation request runs through it. It checks credentials, enforces policy, and chains together modules that decide who can access the system. Most teams rely on it daily without ever tracing what actually happens inside.



It starts as an innocuous bug. A developer miscalculates an offset, a boundary check is missing, a buffer is too small—just a simple oversight in code. But in the world of software security, even the smallest mistakes can rip holes in your defenses. Enter the out-of-bounds write Linux security vulnerability: a coding flaw with the potential to destabilize systems, corrupt data, or worse, create a direct path for attackers to execute malicious code. If you’re managing Linux systems—whether in production, testing, or anywhere in between—this is the kind of vulnerability you don’t ignore.



CVE-2025-11371 doesn’t target Linux directly. It doesn’t need to.



The Extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) was created to make Linux more observable and secure. It extends kernel functionality without requiring new modules or recompilation, enabling precise monitoring, tracing, and policy enforcement at runtime. For defenders, it promised transparency. For attackers, it opened a new space to hide.



For Linux users, software supply chain security means protecting the entire path from source to install. It covers who authors and reviews the code, how it is built, how artifacts and metadata are signed, where they are mirrored, and which keys the client trusts. In short: provenance, freshness, and scoped trust across the package pipeline.



When npm was hit in September, it was tempting to see it as an isolated supply chain attack. A maintainer fell for a phish, popular packages were swapped out, and downstream projects scrambled. But npm wasn’t the only ecosystem in the spotlight this year. PyPI and Docker Hub both faced their own compromises in 2025, and the overlaps are impossible to ignore.



Computer systems, software, applications, and Linux servers are all vulnerable to network security threats. Failure to identify these cybersecurity vulnerabilities, often using a Linux vulnerability scanner, can leave companies vulnerable.



In this blog, we will break down the most relevant examples, so you’ll see exactly what kinds of attacks are active today and why scanning tools are necessary to catch them before they cause damage.



Modern CPUs are fast—blindingly fast—partly because they don’t always wait around for instructions. Instead, they guess which calculations, memory fetches, or code branches might be needed next and execute those guesses ahead of time through a process called speculative execution.



A lost Linux laptop or a recycled server drive can leak everything on it — from system files to sensitive data. Disk encryption changes that. It locks the entire drive, and nothing can be read until the right key is supplied. In this guide, we’ll look at what disk encryption does, how it works on Linux, where it helps most, and the options that are still worth using in 2025.



Full disk encryption is no longer optional in Linux environments. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, Fedora 41, and Debian 12 now ship with it enabled during installation. Regulators are watching closely: in 2023, HIPAA penalties for lost or stolen data averaged more than $1M per case.



A linux proxy server has been around for years, but in 2025, it’s become baseline infrastructure. Privacy demands are higher, compliance rules are stricter, and the hybrid cloud has blurred the edge of the network.



A checksum is a calculated value that represents the exact contents of a file or message. If the file changes — even by a single byte — the checksum changes as well. That’s why it’s often described as a digital fingerprint for data integrity.



For Linux admins and security professionals, containers are often the backbone of modern infrastructure. They’re lightweight, portable, and isolate applications in predictable, well-defined environments. But here's the flipside: containers aren’t impermeable fortresses. They have their flaws, and one of the most critical is the container escape vulnerability—a type of weakness that lets an attacker break out of the container’s restricted environment and gain unauthorized access to the host system.



Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is the practice of collecting information from published or publicly available sources for intelligence purposes.
Let’s talk about a threat that’s smart, sneaky, and dangerous to your Linux systems: rootkits. If you’ve ever heard the term tossed around and wondered what a rootkit is and why it’s such a headache, you’re in the right place. These are not your usual malware nuisances—they’re tools that let attackers dig into a system, stay hidden for the long game, and potentially wreak havoc without leaving many breadcrumbs. For Linux admins and infosec pros, rootkits aren’t just pests; they’re an adversary that requires awareness, vigilance, and a specific approach to deal with.



If you're managing a Linux environment, on-prem or in the cloud, chances are you've already tangled with questions of network security: firewalls, SSH hardening, package integrity checks — all the usual suspects. But Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)?