Debian: DSA-2149-1: Security update for dbus

    Date 20 Jan 2011
    128
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Rémi Denis-Courmont discovered that dbus, a message bus application, is not properly limiting the nesting level when examining messages with extensive nested variants. This allows an attacker to crash the dbus system daemon due to a call stack overflow via crafted messages.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2149-1                     This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                                  Nico Golde
    January 20, 2011                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : dbus
    Vulnerability  : denial of service
    Problem type   : local
    Debian-specific: no
    Debian bug     : none
    CVE ID         : CVE-2010-4352
    
    Rémi Denis-Courmont discovered that dbus, a message bus application,
    is not properly limiting the nesting level when examining messages with
    extensive nested variants.  This allows an attacker to crash the dbus system
    daemon due to a call stack overflow via crafted messages.
    
    
    For the stable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.2.1-5+lenny2.
    
    For the testing distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.2.24-4.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.2.24-4.
    
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your dbus packages.
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.