Debian: DSA-2154-2: exim4 regression fix

    Date30 Jan 2011
    CategoryDebian
    23
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The updated packages from DSA-2154-1 introduced a regression which prevented unprivileged users from using 'exim4 -bf' to test filter configurations. This update fixes this problem.
    
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2154-2                  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                           Stefan Fritsch
    January 30, 2011                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package          : exim4
    Vulnerability    : privilege escalation / regression
    Problem type     : local
    CVE Id(s)        : CVE-2010-4345 CVE-2011-0017
    Debian bug       : 611572
    Behaviour change : yes
    
    The updated packages from DSA-2154-1 introduced a regression which
    prevented unprivileged users from using 'exim4 -bf' to test filter
    configurations. This update fixes this problem.
    
    Please also read the information provided in DSA-2154-1 if you have
    not done so already.
    
    For the stable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.69-9+lenny4.
    
    For the testing distribution (squeeze) and the unstable distribution
    (sid), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":21.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":21.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.