Debian: DSA-2163-2: dajaxice regression fix

    Date01 Mar 2011
    CategoryDebian
    37
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The changes in python-django DSA-2163 necessary to fix the issues CVE-2011-0696 and CVE-2011-0697 introduced an unavoidable backward incompatibility, which caused a regression in dajaxice, which depends on python-django. This update supplies fixed packages for
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2163-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                           Thijs Kinkhorst
    March 1, 2011                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : dajaxice
    Vulnerability  : multiple
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-0696 CVE-2011-0697
    
    The changes in python-django DSA-2163 necessary to fix the issues
    CVE-2011-0696 and CVE-2011-0697 introduced an unavoidable backward
    incompatibility, which caused a regression in dajaxice, which
    depends on python-django. This update supplies fixed packages for
    dajaxice.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.1.5-1squeeze1.
    
    For the testing (wheezy) and unstable distribution (sid), this problem
    has been fixed in version 0.1.8.1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your dajaxice packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":21.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"3","pct":21.43,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.