Debian: DSA-2229-1: spip security update

    Date01 May 2011
    CategoryDebian
    25
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    A vulnerability has been found in SPIP, a website engine for publishing, which allows a malicious registered author to disconnect the website from its database, resulting in denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2229-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 01, 2011                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : spip
    Vulnerability  : programming error
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : not yet available
    
    A vulnerability has been found in SPIP, a website engine for publishing,
    which allows a malicious registered author to disconnect the website 
    from its database, resulting in denial of service.
    
    The oldstable distribution (lenny) doesn't include spip.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.1.1-3squeeze1.
    
    The unstable distribution (sid) will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your spip packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":12.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.