Debian: DSA-2239-1: libmojolicious-perl security update

    Date24 May 2011
    CategoryDebian
    36
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered Mojolicious, a Perl Web Application Framework. The link_to helper was affected by cross-site scripting and implementation errors in the MD5 HMAC and CGI environment handling have been corrected.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2239-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 24, 2011                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libmojolicious-perl
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2010-4802 CVE-2010-4803 CVE-2011-1841 
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered Mojolicious, a Perl Web 
    Application Framework. The link_to helper was affected by cross-site 
    scripting and implementation errors in the MD5 HMAC and CGI environment 
    handling have been corrected.
    
    The oldstable distribution (lenny) doesn't include libmojolicious-perl.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.999926-1+squeeze2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.12-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libmojolicious-perl packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.