Debian: DSA-2487-1: openoffice.org security update

    Date07 Jun 2012
    CategoryDebian
    36
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that OpenOffice.org would not properly process crafted document files, possibly leading to arbitrary code execution. CVE-2012-1149
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2487-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    June 07, 2012                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openoffice.org
    Vulnerability  : buffer overflow
    Problem type   : local (remote)
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-1149 CVE-2012-2334
    
    It was discovered that OpenOffice.org would not properly process
    crafted document files, possibly leading to arbitrary code execution.
    
    CVE-2012-1149
    	Integer overflows in PNG image handling
    
    CVE-2012-2334
    	Integer overflow in operator new[] invocation and heap-based
    	buffer overflow inside the MS-ODRAW parser
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze6.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 of the libreoffice package.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openoffice.org packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.