Debian: DSA-2487-1: openoffice.org security update

    Date 07 Jun 2012
    61
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that OpenOffice.org would not properly process crafted document files, possibly leading to arbitrary code execution. CVE-2012-1149
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2487-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    June 07, 2012                          https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openoffice.org
    Vulnerability  : buffer overflow
    Problem type   : local (remote)
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-1149 CVE-2012-2334
    
    It was discovered that OpenOffice.org would not properly process
    crafted document files, possibly leading to arbitrary code execution.
    
    CVE-2012-1149
    	Integer overflows in PNG image handling
    
    CVE-2012-2334
    	Integer overflow in operator new[] invocation and heap-based
    	buffer overflow inside the MS-ODRAW parser
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze6.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 of the libreoffice package.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openoffice.org packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":20,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"3","pct":68.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.