Debian: DSA-2535-1: rtfm security update

    Date29 Aug 2012
    CategoryDebian
    33
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that rtfm, the Request Tracker FAQ Manager, contains multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the topic administration page.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2535-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    August 29, 2012                        http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : rtfm
    Vulnerability  : cross-site scripting
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-2768
    
    It was discovered that rtfm, the Request Tracker FAQ Manager, contains
    multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the topic
    administration page.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.4.2-4+squeeze1.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution
    (sid), this problem has been fixed in version 4.0.6-4 of the
    request-tracker4 package.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your rtfm packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":12.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.