Debian: DSA-2554-1: iceape security update

    Date26 Sep 2012
    CategoryDebian
    48
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in Iceape, an internet suite based on Seamonkey. The reported vulnerabilities could lead to the execution of arbitrary
    
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2554-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    http://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
    September 26, 2012                     http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceape
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-1970 CVE-2012-1972 CVE-2012-1973 CVE-2012-1974 
                     CVE-2012-1975 CVE-2012-1976 CVE-2012-3959 CVE-2012-3962
                     CVE-2012-3969 CVE-2012-3972 CVE-2012-3978
    
    Several vulnerabilities have been discovered in Iceape, an internet suite based
    on Seamonkey.
    
    The reported vulnerabilities could lead to the execution of arbitrary
    code or the bypass of content-loading restrictions via the location
    object.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.0.11-15.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.7.7-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.7.7-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceape packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.