Debian: DSA-2558-1: bacula security update

    Date08 Oct 2012
    CategoryDebian
    52
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that bacula, a network backup service, does not properly enforce console ACLs. This could allow information about resources to be dumped by an otherwise-restricted client.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2558-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                          Raphael Geissert
    October 08, 2012                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : bacula
    Vulnerability  : information disclosure
    Problem type   : local (remote)
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-4430
    
    It was discovered that bacula, a network backup service, does not
    properly enforce console ACLs. This could allow information about
    resources to be dumped by an otherwise-restricted client.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.0.2-2.2+squeeze1.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.2.6+dfsg-4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your bacula packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.