Debian: DSA-2564-1: tinyproxy security update

    Date23 Oct 2012
    CategoryDebian
    49
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    gpernot discovered that Tinyproxy, a HTTP proxy, is vulnerable to a denial of service by remote attackers by sending crafted request headers.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2564-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                           Thijs Kinkhorst
    October 23, 2012                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : tinyproxy
    Vulnerability  : denial of service
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-3505
    Debian Bug     : 685281
    
    gpernot discovered that Tinyproxy, a HTTP proxy, is vulnerable to a
    denial of service by remote attackers by sending crafted request
    headers.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.8.2-1squeeze3.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.8.3-3.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.8.3-3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your tinyproxy packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.