Debian: DSA-2576-1: trousers security update

    Date 23 Nov 2012
    111
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Andy Lutomirski discovered that tcsd (the TPM userspace daemon) was missing a of input validation. Using carefully crafted input, it can lead to a denial of service by making the daemon crash with a segmentation fault.
    
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2576-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
    November 23, 2012                      https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : trousers
    Vulnerability  : denial of service
    Problem type   : local
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-0698
    Debian Bug     : 692649
    
    Andy Lutomirski discovered that tcsd (the TPM userspace daemon) was missing a
    of input validation. Using carefully crafted input, it can lead to a denial of
    service by making the daemon crash with a segmentation fault.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.3.5-2+squeeze1.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.3.9-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.3.9-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your trousers packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":20,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"3","pct":68.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.