Debian: DSA-2584-1: iceape security update

    Date08 Dec 2012
    CategoryDebian
    26
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in version 2.0.11-17. For the testing distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2584-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
    December 08, 2012                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceape
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-4201 CVE-2012-4207 CVE-2012-4216 CVE-2012-5829 
                     CVE-2012-5842
    Debian Bug     : 
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.0.11-17.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.7.11-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 2.7.11-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceape packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"1","pct":61.54,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":23.08,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":15.38,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.