Debian: DSA-2591-1: mahara security update

    Date27 Dec 2012
    CategoryDebian
    32
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in Mahara - an electronic portfolio, weblog, and resume builder -, which can result in cross-site scripting, clickjacking or arbitrary file execution.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2591-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 27, 2012                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : mahara
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-2239 CVE-2012-2243 CVE-2012-2244 CVE-2012-2246 
                     CVE-2012-2247 CVE-2012-2253 CVE-2012-6037
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in Mahara - an electronic 
    portfolio, weblog, and resume builder -, which can result in cross-site
    scripting, clickjacking or arbitrary file execution.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.2.6-2+squeeze6.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.5.1-3.1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your mahara packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":56.1,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.2,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":31.71,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.