Debian: DSA-2593-1: moin security update

    Date29 Dec 2012
    CategoryDebian
    47
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that missing input validation in the twikidraw and anywikidraw actions can result in the execution of arbitrary code. This security issue in being actively exploited.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2593-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    December 29, 2012                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : moin
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : not available yet
    
    It was discovered that missing input validation in the twikidraw and
    anywikidraw actions can result in the execution of arbitrary code.
    This security issue in being actively exploited.
    
    This update also addresses path traversal in AttachFile.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.9.3-1+squeeze4.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.9.5-4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your moin packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    Advisories

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.