Debian: DSA-2603-1: emacs23 security update

    Date09 Jan 2013
    CategoryDebian
    298
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Paul Ling discovered that Emacs insufficiently restricted the evaluation of Lisp code if enable-local-variables is set to "safe". For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2603-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    January 09, 2013                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : emacs23
    Vulnerability  : programming error
    Problem type   : local
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-3479
    
    Paul Ling discovered that Emacs insufficiently restricted the evaluation 
    of Lisp code if enable-local-variables is set to "safe".
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 23.2+1-7+squeeze1.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 23.4+1-4.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 23.4+1-4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your emacs23 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.