Debian: DSA-2788-1: iceweasel security update

    Date31 Oct 2013
    CategoryDebian
    339
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in iceweasel, Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: multiple memory safety errors, and other implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2788-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                          Raphael Geissert
    October 31, 2013                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-5590 CVE-2013-5595 CVE-2013-5597 CVE-2013-5599 
                     CVE-2013-5600 CVE-2013-5601 CVE-2013-5602 CVE-2013-5604
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in iceweasel, Debian's version 
    of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: multiple memory safety errors, and
    other implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary
    code.
    
    The iceweasel version in the oldstable distribution (squeeze) is no
    longer supported with security updates.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 17.0.10esr-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems will fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"22","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.