Debian: DSA-3174-1: iceweasel security update

    Date25 Feb 2015
    CategoryDebian
    30
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors and implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary code or information disclosure.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3174-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    February 25, 2015                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-0822 CVE-2015-0827 CVE-2015-0831 CVE-2015-0836
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version
    of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors and
    implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary code or
    information disclosure.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 31.5.0esr-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 31.5.0esr-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":27.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":18.18,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.