Debian: DSA-3198-2: php5 regression update

    Date28 Mar 2015
    CategoryDebian
    67
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The previous update for php5, DSA-3198-1, introduced a regression causing segmentation faults when using SoapClient::__setSoapHeader. Updated packages are now available to address this regression. For reference, the original advisory text follows.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3198-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
    March 28, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : php5
    Debian Bug     : 781125
    
    The previous update for php5, DSA-3198-1, introduced a regression
    causing segmentation faults when using SoapClient::__setSoapHeader.
    Updated packages are now available to address this regression. For
    reference, the original advisory text follows.
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in the PHP language:
    
    CVE-2015-2301
    
        Use-after-free in the phar extension.
    
    CVE-2015-2331
    
        Emmanuel Law discovered an integer overflow in the processing
        of ZIP archives, resulting in denial of service or potentially
        the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.4.39-0+deb7u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your php5 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.85,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":15.38,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":30.77,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.