Debian: DSA-3207-1: shibboleth-sp2 security update

    Date28 Mar 2015
    CategoryDebian
    69
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    A denial of service vulnerability was found in the Shibboleth (an federated identity framework) Service Provider. When processing certain malformed SAML message generated by an authenticated attacker, the daemon could crash.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3207-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
    March 28, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : shibboleth-sp2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-2684
    
    A denial of service vulnerability was found in the Shibboleth (an
    federated identity framework) Service Provider. When processing certain
    malformed SAML message generated by an authenticated attacker, the
    daemon could crash.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.4.3+dfsg-5+deb7u1.
    
    For the upcoming stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been
    fixed in version 2.5.3+dfsg-2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.5.3+dfsg-2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your shibboleth-sp2 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":14.29,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.