Debian: DSA-3260-1: iceweasel security update

    Date13 May 2015
    CategoryDebian
    96
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors, buffer overflows and use-after-frees may lead to the execution of arbitrary code, privilege escalation or denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3260-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 13, 2015                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-3079 CVE-2015-0797 CVE-2015-2708 CVE-2015-2710 
                     CVE-2015-2713 CVE-2015-2716
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version
    of the Mozilla Firefox web browser:  Multiple memory safety errors,
    buffer overflows and use-after-frees may lead to the execution of
    arbitrary code, privilege escalation or denial of service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
    in version 31.7.0esr-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 31.7.0esr-1~deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 38.0-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.