Debian: DSA-3301-1: haproxy security update

    Date 05 Jul 2015
    567
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Charlie Smurthwaite of aTech Media discovered a flaw in HAProxy, a fast and reliable load balancing reverse proxy, when HTTP pipelining is used. A client can take advantage of this flaw to cause data corruption and retrieve uninitialized memory contents that exhibit data from a past
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3301-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    July 05, 2015                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : haproxy
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-3281
    
    Charlie Smurthwaite of aTech Media discovered a flaw in HAProxy, a fast
    and reliable load balancing reverse proxy, when HTTP pipelining is used.
    A client can take advantage of this flaw to cause data corruption and
    retrieve uninitialized memory contents that exhibit data from a past
    request or session.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.5.8-3+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.5.14-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your haproxy packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.