Debian: DSA-3320-1: openafs security update

    Date30 Jul 2015
    CategoryDebian
    60
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that OpenAFS, the implementation of the distributed filesystem AFS, contained several flaws that could result in information leak, denial-of-service or kernel panic.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3320-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    July 30, 2015                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openafs
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-3282 CVE-2015-3283 CVE-2015-3284 CVE-2015-3285 
                     CVE-2015-3287
    
    It was discovered that OpenAFS, the implementation of the distributed
    filesystem AFS, contained several flaws that could result in
    information leak, denial-of-service or kernel panic.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.6.1-3+deb7u3.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.6.9-2+deb8u3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openafs packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":16,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.