Debian: DSA-3322-1: ruby-rack security update

    Date31 Jul 2015
    CategoryDebian
    413
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Tomek Rabczak from the NCC Group discovered a flaw in the normalize_params() method in Rack, a modular Ruby webserver interface. A remote attacker can use this flaw via specially crafted requests to cause a `SystemStackError` and potentially cause a denial of service
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3322-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                     Salvatore Bonaccorso
    July 31, 2015                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby-rack
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-3225
    Debian Bug     : 789311
    
    Tomek Rabczak from the NCC Group discovered a flaw in the
    normalize_params() method in Rack, a modular Ruby webserver interface.
    A remote attacker can use this flaw via specially crafted requests to
    cause a `SystemStackError` and potentially cause a denial of service
    condition for the service.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 1.4.1-2.1+deb7u1.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.5.2-3+deb8u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.5.2-4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-rack packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.