Debian: DSA-3367-1: wireshark security update

    Date24 Sep 2015
    CategoryDebian
    133
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the dissectors/parsers for ZigBee, GSM RLC/MAC, WaveAgent, ptvcursor, OpenFlow, WCCP and in internal functions which could result in denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3367-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 24, 2015                    https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wireshark
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-6241 CVE-2015-6242 CVE-2015-6243 CVE-2015-6244 
                     CVE-2015-6245 CVE-2015-6246 CVE-2015-6247 CVE-2015-6248
                     CVE-2015-6249
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the dissectors/parsers for
    ZigBee, GSM RLC/MAC, WaveAgent, ptvcursor, OpenFlow, WCCP and in internal
    functions which could result in denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.12.1+g01b65bf-4+deb8u3.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed
    in version 1.12.7+g7fc8978-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.12.7+g7fc8978-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wireshark packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"6","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":27.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":18.18,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.