Debian: DSA-3392-1: freeimage security update

    Date04 Nov 2015
    CategoryDebian
    93
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Pengsu Cheng discovered that FreeImage, a library for graphic image formats, contained multiple integer underflows that could lead to a denial of service: remote attackers were able to trigger a crash by supplying a specially crafted image.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3392-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    https://www.debian.org/security/                       Sebastien Delafond
    November 04, 2015                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : freeimage
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-0852
    Debian Bug     : 797165
    
    Pengsu Cheng discovered that FreeImage, a library for graphic image
    formats, contained multiple integer underflows that could lead to a
    denial of service: remote attackers were able to trigger a crash by
    supplying a specially crafted image.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed
    in version 3.15.1-1.1.
    
    For the stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.15.4-4.2.
    
    For the testing distribution (stretch) and unstable distribution
    (sid), this problem has been fixed in version 3.15.4-6.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your freeimage packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.